News
Business
- [03/09] Samsung, Panasonic start selling 3-D TVs
- [03/09] Britain's trade deficit widens
- [03/09] China passenger car sales up 55 percent in Feb
Employment Practices
- [03/09] Senate to take up unemployment insurance extension
- [03/08] Allergan CEO got $11.1M in compensation in 2009
- [03/08] Court will decide if NASA checks can continue
Real Estate
- [03/09] E-House Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Results and Declares Cash Dividend
- [03/09] CRIC Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Results
- [03/08] Bairdwarner.com Offers Exclusive Online Search Engine for Investors & Prospective Buyers of Area Foreclosed Properties
Top Headlines
- [03/09] John Edwards sex tape dispute back in NC court
- [03/09] Class-action lawsuits could cost Toyota $3B-plus
- [03/09] Senate to take up unemployment insurance extension
Case Summaries
Banking Law
[03/09]
Martinez v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
In an action under Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), and California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), claiming that a mortgage lender charged plaintiffs an illegal underwriting fee, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where: 1) the clear and unambiguous language of RESPA Section 8(b) did not reach the practice of "overcharging"; and 2) the UCL claims alleging "unfair" and "fraudulent" conduct were preempted by the National Bank Act, and the allegations of "illegal" conduct failed to state a claim.
[03/02]
Ma v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
In an action against Merrill Lynch based on unauthorized transfers from plaintiff's investment account, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where New York U.C.C. Section 4-A-505, which imposes a one-year statute of repose on certain claims based on electronic funds transfers, bars plaintiffs' common law claims, which had longer limitations periods.
[02/26]
Williams v. Fleming
In plaintiff's suit against a bank, the US, and and an FDIC associate examiner, claiming that the associate examiner's racially motivated bias against plaintiff and other African-Americans was the reason he stopped receiving loans from the bank, dismissal of all claims including the Bivens suit against the associate examiner is affirmed where, because the dismissal of plaintiff's suit against the US was on the merits, and not for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, his remaining Bivens suit was properly barred by section 2676 of the FTCA.
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.



